nhà cái tặng tiền miễn phí 2019_chơi slot game online_chiến lược thắng baccarat

Barack Obama: The Latest in a Line of Cowboy Presidents?

| 0 Comments | 0 TrackBacks

In an interesting choice of headwear, President-elect Barack Obama, who, in speaking a great deal about bringing change to our country, has tapped into the hope many Americans have for a Democratic wresting of power away from a president who has been caricaturized as a gunslinging Yosemite Sam-style cowboy, is seen in the photograph to the left wearing the style of chapeau most often associated with his cartoonish predecessor:

Of course, the cowboy hat is an American institution and Mr. Obama can be seen as merely the latest in a long line of American presidents who have chosen to don the iconic staple of Western wear:

George W. Bush:

Bill Clinton:

George H. W. Bush:

Ronald Reagan:

Lyndon Johnson:

Theodore Roosevelt:

Ratemyprofessors.com, a website on which students may anonymously leave comments on a given professor's relative strengths and weaknesses, has recently released a list of the fifty highest ranked colleges based on student assessments of each institution's respective faculty. "Selecting only schools with a minimum of at least 30 rated professors," the website informs us, they "computed the average professor rating for each school (only professors with 30 ratings or higher)" before they were "ranked from high to low according to their average rating."

Although the authority of the list is no doubt limited by its having been based upon the voluntarily offered rankings of individual instructors by students who have sought out the website (clearly, a student could submit multiple ratings for the same instructor and those that visit the website are not necessarily representative of a school's entire student body), it does provide us with some food for thought. For instance, schools most often ranked highest by US News & World Report, say, or the Princeton Review, are conspicuously absent from the Ratemyprofessors list (a single Ivy League institution -- Cornell University -- clings on to the last spot, for instance). One possible interpretation of this fact is that research-oriented universities tend to hire faculty less for their ability to teach then for their ability to produce journal articles or conduct research. The problem with such a scenario, of course, is that while students are drawn to certain institutions for the quality of education its reputation seems to promise, they are often met with indifferent or ineffectual scholars wholly uninterested in teaching. Naturally, this is but one possible way of interpreting a thoroughly unscientific body of data. . .

The rankings, as determined by the website's users (italics denote schools likely to appear very high in other rankings):

1. Brigham Young University 
2. Southeastern Louisiana University 
3. Christopher Newport University 
4. Stephen F. Austin State University 
5. University of Houston 
6. Texas Christian University 
7. Augusta State University 
8. University of Central Oklahoma 
9. College of William and Mary 
10. Grove City College 
11. James Madison University 
12. Grand Valley State University 
13. Florida International University 
14. University of Texas at San Antonio 
15. University of Virginia 
16. Florida State University 
17. Louisiana Tech University 
18. Liberty University 
19. University of North Florida 
20. George Mason University 
21. West Virginia University 
22. University of Delaware 
23. University of Central Florida 
24. Utah Valley State College 
25. University of Northern Iowa 
26. York College of Pennsylvania 
27. Marist College 
28. College of Charleston 
29. University of South Florida 
30. Jacksonville State University 
31. Oakland University 
32. American University 
33. San Francisco State University 
34. Appalachian State University 
35. Indiana University of Pennsylvania 
36. Northeastern University 
37. Radford University 
38. Towson University 
39. Bradley University 
40. University of Tennessee at Martin 
41. Virginia Commonwealth University 
42. Old Dominion University 
43. Nicholls State University 
44. Oregon State University 
45. Boston University 
46. Northwest Missouri State University 
47. University of Florida 
48. Edinboro University of Pennsylvania 
49. Kutztown University of Pennsylvania 
50. Cornell University

Among the "elite" schools missing from the list are Duke, Harvard, Brown, Penn, Dartmouth, Columbia, Princeton, Johns Hopkins, Emory, University of California-Berkeley, University of Wisconsin-Madison, the University of Chicago, Stanford, UNC-Chapel Hill, and the University of Michigan-Ann Arbor.

Howard Zinn Will Vote For Nader After All

| 0 Comments | 0 TrackBacks

After having added his name to the list of leftists intending to vote for Barack Obama out of anti-Republican sentiment, Howard Zinn has written a letter to Ralph Nader in which the historian admits that he "was wrong in saying that he would vote for Obama" and promises the consumer advocate that he "will vote for [Nader]." Admittedly, Zinn seems to imply that, were Massachusetts not a "slam-dunk state" for the Democrats, he would have cast his vote for Barack Obama on Tuesday.

At the heart of this story is something I have been discouraged by, namely the tendency of self-described liberals to vote for Barack Obama less out of a genuine enthusiasm for the man (though, undeniably, the Illinois senator does seem to elicit the sort of fervor one might expect of tweens attending an N'Sync concert from decidedly un-tweeny people) than out of a hatred for George W. Bush and the GOP.

The argument, of course, is that Barack Obama is better than the Republican alternative.

Thus, when I tell people that I intend to cast my vote for a third party candidate, I am greeted with the same sanctimonious refrain I hear every four years: "you're throwing your vote away."

And I hate that sort of bullshit. It's presumptuous to assume that I would want to give my vote to either of the major party candidates if I did not have a third party candidate for whom I felt any preference.

When the pro-Obama pragmatists fail to convince me with their case -- you wouldn't want another Republican in office would you? -- for my supporting their candidate, I am often accused of cynicism, which is ironic. It is ironic because it is precisely my lack of cynicism that enables me to vote for the person I feel I should support. If I were cynical, I would agree that my vote is worthless and that, if anything, I should accept the lesser of two evils as the best choice. But I do not believe this to be the case. The minute a vote for someone becomes a vote against someone, it ceases to be a vote for anything. It signifies a giving up, an acceptance of the belief that what one wants, one will never get.

And it is this sort of acquiescence that is exactly what leads to the sort of political stagnation we have in the United States. I mean, the Democratic Party would be considered a center-right party in most of the Western world while the Republicans would be a bit further right. The differences between the two parties, despite the passionate pleas to the contrary, are really quite minor.

And this is my point: I am not voting against Barack Obama nor am I (as some of my more vocal "liberal" friends claim) voting for a conservative America. I am voting for what I want, even if the polls say I won't have my way. If I want a de-corporatized democratic socialism, voting for Barack Obama or John McCain would be throwing my vote away and, if people like me (progressive, liberal, and often educated folks) stop saying "no thanks" to the two big parties, it won't matter that they're wrong because they will have effectively silenced the dissent necessary to bring about real change.

I want change, not the illusion of progress.

And if that hope is too audacious, America's Straight Thought Express derailed at the station.

About this Archive

This page is an archive of entries from November 2008 listed from newest to oldest.

September 2008 is the previous archive.

December 2008 is the next archive.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.